I 摘要 专利权作为知识产权中的一种，能否得到有效保护事关国家、企业、权利人 的成长与消亡。然而现实情况却是要么由于侵权人版权意识薄弱，不清楚需要依 法获得授权；要么因违法或侵权成本较低而存在侥幸心理恶意侵权；要么就因为 专利权人在维权时成本高、难度大，且通过维权最终所获赔偿相对较低，导致专 利权人维权积极性不高；专利侵权事件时有发生。当专利权受到不法侵害时，专 利侵权赔偿额是否合理就显得尤为重要，专利侵权赔偿额的影响因素前人有较深 入的研究。专利侵权赔偿司法制度作为专利侵权赔偿的依据，在我国历次涉及知 识产权的相关问题司法制度变革中都会涉及。分析专利侵权赔偿额影响因素与实 际赔偿额的关系，验证专利司法制度变革对哪些影响因素具有调节作用，对国家 司法制度改革和企业知识产权战略制定有着重要的参考意义。 本文通过对866例2010年到2019年之间中国法院网旗下中国判决文书网及 聚法案例网发布的侵权被承认且产生了侵权赔偿额的发明专利侵权案件为基础， 通过系统科学的方式，首先在研究前人资料和分析案件的基础上，确定了5个自 变量包括：请求赔偿额、法院所在地、专利权人类型、专利申请时长以及审判法 院类型，1个调节变量：2014年中国知识产权严保护元年为分界线。然后利用统 计学的方法对历年侵权赔偿数量、赔偿额以及地域分布特征进行了描述性统计分 析，接着利用SPSS 20.0对大量赔偿额进行回归分析，研究专利损害赔偿的相关性 因素，并建立一个线性方程来尝试解释赔偿额的变化；最后验证调节变量与每一 个自变量之间是否存在调节作用，并做出结论和建议。 通过上述分析，得到如下结论：请求赔偿额、法院所在地、专利权人类型、 专利申请时长以及审判法院类型的不同会导致不同的实际赔偿额。请求赔偿额对 实际赔偿额有着显著的正向影响；东部地区的侵权赔偿额远远高于中西部；专利 权人为企业时往往能得到更多侵权赔偿额；专利申请时间越长获得的实际赔偿额 一般较高。2014年底的这次司法制度变革对专利权人类型、地区、请求赔偿额有 着显著的调节作用，对审判法院类别、专利申请时长几乎没有影响。本次研究结 果一方面有助于厘清专利侵权赔偿的关键影响因素及此次司法制度变革对哪些因 素有调节作用，为司法判决、专利制度进一步深化改革提供科学的参考；另一方 面，有助于企业紧扣专利制度变革的脉搏，有目的性的调整企业发展的战略，促 进企业创新，为企业高速发展注入活力。 关键词：司法制度、专利侵权，赔偿额，调节作用 ABSTRACT ABSTRACT As one of the intellectual property rights, whether patent rights can be effectively protected is related to the growth and demise of countries, enterprises and right holders. However, due to the reality that the infringer ’s copyright awareness is weak and it is not clear whether it needs to be authorized in accordance with the law, or there is a malicious psychological infringement due to illegal or low infringement costs, or because for patentees the costs and difficulty in defending rights is too much and the final compensation obtained through rights protection is relatively low, it leads to the low enthusiasm of patent holders for rights protection, and patent infringement incidents occur from time to time. When the patent right is illegally infringed, it is particularly important whether the amount of compensation for patent infringement is reasonable. The influencing factors of the amount of compensation for patent infringement have been studied in depth by previous people. In China, as the basis of patent infringement compensation, issues related to intellectual property rights will be involved in the judicial system reforms. Analyzing the relationship between the influencing factors of patent infringement compensation and actual compensation amount, and verifying the judicial system reform can regulate which influencing factors, have important reference significance for the reform of the national judicial system and the formulation of corporate intellectual property strategy. This article is based on 866 cases of invention patent infringement cases that have been recognized by China Judicial Document Network and Jufa Case Network under the China Court Network from 2010 to 2019, and have generated infringement compensation. Through a systematic and scientific way, First, on the basis of researching predecessors' data and analyzing cases, and determine the five independent variables including: the amount of compensation requested, the location of the court, the type of patentee, the length of the patent application, the type of trial court, and a moderating variable (the first year of strict protection of intellectual property in China in 2014 Is the dividing line). Then use statistical methods to conduct a descriptive statistical analysis of the amount of infringement compensation, compensation amount and geographical distribution characteristics over the years. In addition, use SPSS 20.0 to perform regression analysis on a large amount of compensation amount to study the ABSTRACT III correlation factors of patent damage compensation and establish a linear equation trying to explain the change in compensation. Finally, verify whether there is an adjustment effect between the adjustment variable and each independent variable, and make conclusions and recommendations. Through the above analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: the difference in the amount of compensation requested, the location of the court, the type of patentee, the length of the patent application, and the type of trial court will result in different actual amounts of compensation. The amount of compensation requested has a significant positive impact on the actual amount of compensation; the amount of infringement compensation in the eastern region is much higher than that in the central and western regions; when the patentee is an enterprise, it often gets more infringement compensation; the longer it takes for a patent application, the lager amount of compensation it obtains. The reform of the judicial system at the end of 2014 had a significant adjustment effect on the type of patentee, region, and amount of compensation requested, while had little impact on the type of trial court and the length of patent application. The results of this study on the one hand can help to clarify the key influencing factors of patent infringement compensation and judge this judicial system reform has regulated which factors, thus provide a scientific reference for the further deepening of judicial judgments and patent system reform. On the other hand, it helps companies to keep up with the pulse of patent system reform, adjust their development strategies purposefully, promote enterprise innovation, and inject vitality into their rapid development. Keywords: Judicial system, Patent infringement Amount of compensation, Moderating effect ， 目 录 IV 目 录 第一章 绪 论 .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 选题背景 ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 理论基础 ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2.1 前人研究成果 ........................................................................................ 3 1.2.2 相关法律规定 ........................................................................................ 6 1.3 研究思路及研究目标 ........................................................................................ 8 第二章 我国司法制度变革 .......................................................................................... 10 2.1 《专利法》的颁布及修正 .............................................................................. 10 2.2 知识产权法院制度的建立 .............................................................................. 10 2.3 “严保护”专利制度 ............................................................................................ 11 第三章 样本来源及变量设定 ...................................................................................... 13 3.1 样本来源 .......................................................................................................... 13 3.2变量设定 .......................................................................................................... 13 第四章 描述性统计与