2012 年广东省出台了《关于加快专业镇中小微企业服务平台建设的意见》，文中
将广东省专业镇中小微企业公共服务平台划分为九大类，提倡建立多元的公共服务平
台，并陆续发布各类平台申报与专项资金管理指南。而在 2013 年及之后，省政府部门
开始鼓励创建协同创新平台，其服务内容与服务对象较之前均有所延伸，可称之为中
小微企业公共服务平台的升级版。因此，本文的研究对象没有脱离政策发展动向，对其
进行绩效评价，依然具有推广意义。服务平台在政策的引导下数量激增，但质量却良莠
不齐，为提高平台的资源配置效率，规范平台的服务管理流程，有必要制定统一的考核
标准
服务平台类型众多，如果单独设计不仅难度很大，而且不具备比较性。本文将九
大类服务平台归为三大类（纯公益型、半公益型和非公益型），基于政府视角设计出了
一套综合指标体系，对不同类别的服务平台可以适当增减异质性指标。这套指标体系
以资源配置、管理水平、社会效益和经济效益作为一级指标。本文依据投入产出理论，
运用随机前沿法（SFA）和共同前沿法（Metafrontier）进行绩效评价。鉴于两种方法在
前人的研究中，多用来研究企业、行业及区域技术效率问题，其投入产出指标的个数不
多且都是定量指标，所得数值为绝对值，而不是相对值。因此，本文以初拟指标体系中
的定量指标结合相关资料中的其他定量指标，通过绩效评价与指标体系优化，确定最
终的评价体系。本文最大的目标是设计出一套针对于中小微企业公共服务平台的绩效
评价指标体系，模拟数据、绩效评价与指标优选等过程都是为了验证指标体系的可行
性。应指出的是，服务平台的数据是依据样本点随机模拟生成，在现实层面并没有一一广东工业大学硕士学位论文
II
对应的实体，因此绩效评价的结果只能作为辅助分析，不能为某个平台解决针对性问
题。后面的启示与政策建议主要围绕整个研究过程及前期现状层面的内容进行探讨
结果表明，平台技术水平的高低为半公益型<纯公益型<非公益型；虽然平均水平有差
异，但在每类平台中既有技术效率接近于 1，又有技术效率接近于 0 的平台；虽然筛选
过程很严格，但指标体系的最终结果还是比较合理的。因此，运用这套绩效评价体系是
可行的
关键词:公共服务平台；绩效评价；非参数前沿法（SFA）；共同前沿法（Meta-frontier）ABSTRACT
III
ABSTRACT
The specialized town is a kind of cluster economic model developed in Guangdong in the
late 1980s and early 1990s. It is based on the town area as the basic unit, which with the leading
traditional industry, the low technical level, the professional market division and the industrial
chain of the same kind or upstream and downstream products. In the long historical process,
the professional town’s business model has gradually changed from small workshops to the
small and medium enterprises with formal organization system, which increasingly become
the main force of economic development in Guangdong Province. Of which, public service
platform of small and medium enterprises in Guangdong Province plays a very important role
in the specialized town of economic development process, and also in the development of
small and medium-sized micro-enterprises.
In 2012, Guangdong Province promulgated the Opinions on Accelerating the
Construction of Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Service Platforms in Specialized Towns.
In this paper, the public service platform of small and medium-sized enterprises in Guangdong
Province is divided into nine categories, government promoted the establishment of a
diversified public service platform, and then released the guide of platform’ declaring and
special funds’ management. Since 2013, the provincial government departments began to
encourage the creation of collaborative innovation platform, of which service content and
service objects have been extended than before, in fact, it’s an upgrade version of small and
medium micro-enterprise public service platform. Therefore, the small and medium-sized
enterprise service platform in this paper is not out of the policy development trend, its
performance evaluation still has the promotion significance. Under the guidance of policy, the
quantity of service platform increases sharply, but the quality is very different. In order to
improve the efficiency of resource allocation and standardize the service management process
of the platform, it is necessary to formulate a unified assessment standard.
Service platform types are numerous, if designing separately is not only very difficult,
but also do not have comparison. In this paper, nine categories of service platforms are广东工业大学硕士学位论文
IV
classified into three broad categories (pure public, semi-public and nonprofit), and a
comprehensive index system is designed based on the government perspective. The different
types of service platforms can be appropriately increased and decreased heterogeneous
indicators. This index system sets resource allocation, management level, social benefits and
economic benefits as the level 1 indicators. Based on the input-output theory, this paper uses
the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) and Metafrontier to assess effectiveness. In view of the
fact that the two methods are used to study the efficiency of enterprises, industry or regional
technical efficiency in previous studies, the total input and output indicators are few and are
quantitative, the absolute value is not the relative value. Therefore, this article uses the
quantitative index in the initial index system and combines the other quantitative indexes in
the relevant data，through the performance evaluation and index system optimization, and
determine the final evaluation index system. The biggest goal of this paper is to design a set
of index system, data simulating，performance evaluating and index optimization are all to
verify the feasibility of the index system. It should be noted that the data service platform is
generated by simulating based on the scattered sample points in random, and does not
correspond to the entity, so the performance evaluation results can only be used as an auxiliary
analysis, and can not provide the solutions of targeted problems for anyone . The following
recommendations and policy recommendations mainly focus on the whole research process
and the current situation. The results show that the technical level of the platform is semi-
public <pure public <non-public; although the average level is different, but in each type of
platform technology is close to 1, and technical efficiency also close to 0; although the
screening process is very strict, but the final result of the index system is quite reasonable.
Therefore, the use of this performance evaluation system is feasible.
Key word: Public service platform; Performance evaluation; Stochastic Frontier Analysis
(SFA); Metafrontier目录
V
目 录
摘要...I
ABSTRACT ... III
目 录.V
CONTENT .. VIII
第一章 绪论....1
1.1 研究背景和意义 ........... 1
1.2 研究内容 ........... 3
1.3 技术路线图 ....... 4
1.4 主要创新点 ....... 5
第二章 文献综述........7
2.1 专业镇的相关理论 ....... 7
2.1.1 专业镇的概念及形成过程
。。。以上简介无排版格式，详细内容请下载查看
==>>