首页 > 资料专栏 > 论文 > 经营论文 > 知识管理论文 > MBA论文_旅游学科教师的科研合作网络对知识创新绩效的影响研究DOC

MBA论文_旅游学科教师的科研合作网络对知识创新绩效的影响研究DOC

资料大小:1523KB(压缩后)
文档格式:DOC
资料语言:中文版/英文版/日文版
解压密码:m448
更新时间:2018/5/21(发布于云南)

类型:金牌资料
积分:--
推荐:升级会员

   点此下载 ==>> 点击下载文档


文本描述
摘要
随着知识经济时代的到来,知识被认为是竞争优势的来源之一。如何知识
创新、提高知识创新绩效受到越来越多的关注。旅游业是一个朝阳产业,相关
的研究比较迟。旅游业也是一个综合性产业,涉及面宽泛,统计发现学者间的
合作研究在旅游学科已成为主流,国际研究的合作更加突出。那么,旅游学科
教师的科研合作对于知识创新绩效会起到什么样的影响作用?如何有效提高科
研团队与个人绩效,很值得进行深入的研究探讨。
本文从教师合作成员知识多样性与合作网络两个视角,分别研究其对知识
创新绩效的影响。在文献综述的基础上,以团队理论、知识流动理论、社会网
络理论以及信息资源理论作为教师科研合作网络对知识创新绩效影响相关假设
的依托,构建教师科研合作网络对知识创新绩效的影响模型。选取 SSCI 数据库
旅游类22种期刊中,1983—2015年有中国两岸四地学者发表的文章为研究对象,
经信息一致化处理,对各院校知识创新绩效予以排名,选出绩效排名前 30 高校
内的 511 位教师发表文章情况作为研究样本,运用社会网络分析、主成分分析、
相关分析、回归分析等方法,对数据进行实证分析。并用香农指数计算教师合
作者知识多样性,以衡量个人获取知识多样化程度;将合作网络指标分为网络
关系指标与网络结构指标,其中网络关系指标用关系强度来表示,网络结构指
标选取了网络密度、网络中心性和结构洞;知识创新绩效用发表文章数量、期
刊影响因子、作者顺序来衡量。
结果表明:(1)知识多样性对知识创新绩效有非常显著的正向影响,其中
部门多样性影响最大;(2)关系强度与知识创新绩效呈“倒 U 型”关系;(3)
网络密度对知识创新绩效有非常显著的负向影响;(4)网络中心性、结构洞对
知识创新绩效有非常显著的正向影响。(5)知识多样性加强了关系强度与知识
创新绩效之间的“倒 U 型”关系;(6)知识多样性加强了网络密度对知识创新
绩效的负向作用,但不调节网络中心性对知识创新绩效的影响,正向调节结构
洞与知识创新绩效之间的正向关系。
最后,结合研究结论与当今旅游学科科研现状,从个人层面、团队层面、
学校层面以及国家层面提出关于加强我国旅游学科科研团队建设发展的系统化
对策。II
关键词: 知识多样性 网络关系 网络结构 知识创新绩效 旅游学科III
Abstract
With the advent of the knowledge economy, knowledge is considered a source of
competitive advantage. How to carry on knowledge innovation and improve
knowledge innovation performance are more and more attention. Tourism is a sunrise
industry, the related research is late. Tourism industry is also a comprehensive
industry, involving a wide range of aspects. According to the statistics, we find that
the cooperation between scholars in tourism has become the mainstream, and the
cooperation of international research is more prominent. So, what kind of impact does
the research collaboration of tourism teachers on knowledge innovation performance
play? How to effective improve the research team and personal performance, which is
worth conducting in-depth study.
This paper studies the impact of knowledge diversity and cooperative network on
the performance of knowledge innovation. On the basis of literature review, we use
the team theory,knowledge flow theory, social network theory and information
resources theory as the basis of the hypothesis of the impact of teachers&39; scientific
research cooperation network on knowledge innovation performance. And we
construct the model of the influence of teachers&39; scientific research cooperation
network on knowledge innovation performance. Then, we select four cross-strait
scholar published articles from 1983 to 2015 in 22 kinds of journals of tourism in
SSCI database for the study. These data are carried on uniformization, after that the
institutions are ranked by the knowledge innovation performance to select 511
tourism teachers published articles as a research sample whose colleges and
universities have high knowledge innovation performance ranked in top 30. We use
the methods of social network analysis, principal component analysis, correlation
analysis, regression analysis etc. to conduct the empirical analysis. This study uses
the Shannon index to compute the knowledge diversity of tourism teachers’
collaborators. In addition, the cooperative network indicators are divided into
indicators of network relationships and network structures, and choose tie strength asIV
network relationships’ index, and the density, group centrality and structural holes as
relationship structures’ indexes. The next, we use the number of published articles,
papers published journal impact factor, the author order to measure knowledge
innovation performance.
The results show that: first one, knowledge diversity has a significant positive
impact on the performance of knowledge innovation, in which the sector knowledge
diversity has the greatest impact on knowledge innovation performance. Secondly, the
tie strength has an inverted U impact on knowledge innovation performance. Thirdly,
network density has a very significant negative predictive effect on knowledge
innovation performance. Fourthly, network centrality and structural hole has a very
significant positive predictive effect on knowledge innovation performance. Fifthly,
knowledge diversity strengthens the inverted U relationship between the relationship
strength and the knowledge innovation performance. Sixthly, the diversity of
knowledge strengthens the negative effect of network density on knowledge
innovation performance, and enhance structural hole positive effect on knowledge
innovation performance, however don`t mediate centrality effect. Finally, this paper
discussed the results and pointed out the limitations and the directions of future
research.
In the end, based on the conclusion of the study and current situation of scientific
research in tourism, the study puts forward the systematic countermeasures to
strengthen the development of the scientific research team of the tourism subject in
China from the individual level, the team level, the school level and the national
level.
Key Words: knowledge diversity network relationship network structure
knowledge innovation performance tourism disciplineV
目 录
第 1 章 绪论...............................................................................................................1
1.1 研究背景与问题提出 ......................................................................................1
1.1.1 研究背景 ...................................................................................................1
1.1.2 问题提出 ...................................................................................................3
1.2 研究目的与研究意义 ......................................................................................5
1.2.1 研究目的 ...................................................................................................5
1.2.2 研究意义 ...................................................................................................5
1.3 研究思路与研究方法 ......................................................................................7
1.3.1 研究思路 ...................................................................................................7
1.3.2 研究方法 ...................................................................................................7
1.4 研究内容与技术路线 ......................................................................................8
1.4.1 研究内容 ...................................................................................................8
1.4.2 技术路线 ...................................................................................................9
第 2 章 文献综述.....................................................................................................11
2.1 科研合作网络研究综述 ................................................................................11
2.1.1 科研合作 .................................................................................................11
2.1.2 科研合作网络 .........................................................................................12
2.1.3 知识多样性 .............................................................................................16
2.2 知识创新绩效研究综述 ................................................................................18
2.2.1 知识创新 .................................................................................................18
2.2.2 知识创新绩效 ..........................................