本文以北京市城中村为研究对象，针对城中村改造补偿问题对海淀区三个已
改城中村 120 户村民(居民)进行了调查，对肖家河、榆树庄村等的负责人进行了
实地访谈，通过问卷数据分析、对比分析、定性与定量相结合等方法对城中村改
造现状进行分析并构建了村民可持续生计保障框架。主要研究内容及成果包括：
(1)理论基础研究。对相关概念进行了界定，并对北京市城中村的源起、特殊性
以及 20 多年来改造的进展进行交代。(2)北京市城中村改造现状分析。包括补偿
机制以及村民生计两个方面，得出现行补偿机制不完善，补偿方式单一、补偿标
准不统一；村民生计资本遭受不同程度的损失，可持续生计面临挑战。(3)建立
村民可持续生计保障框架。综合考虑了村民的历史价值、现实价值以及长远价值，
通过货币补偿、就业补偿、留地安置补偿以及完善社会保障的这种四位一体的保
障方式对村民受损的自然资本、物质资本、社会资本、人力资本以及资金资本提
供多元化的补偿，该模型的有效运转需要各利益相关者的积极参与及配合。
关键词：城中村改造；可持续生计
Abstract
Since China’s reform and opening up, Beijing has launched five rounds of
village-in-city reconstruction, and plan to completely clear the village during the 12th
Five-Year Plan; Beijing is moving towards an international metropolis step by step.
However, land-lost means loss of security; villagers’ lifestyle, the way of working and
social identity are changed, therefore villagers’ subsequent livelihood problem has
become a serious problem in China's urban development which has to be cautiously
considered. How to formulate a fair and reasonable compensation and safeguard
measures, which can not only guarantee the feasibility of the compensation , but also
ensure the villagers’ long-term development ability, this is the research direction of
this paper.
Taking Beijing’s village-in-city as the research object, aiming at compensation
problem in village-in-city reconstruction, 120 villagers (residents) from three
transformed villages in Haidian District were investigated, and we also interviewed
principals of Xiao Jiahe, Yu Shuzhuang village and so on. Through the questionnaire
data analysis, comparative analysis, qualitative and quantitative combination methods,
we analyze the situation of the village transformation and built villager’s sustainable
livelihood security model. The main contents and results are as follows: (1)Basic
theory research. Related concepts are definited; particularity and origin of the
Beijing’s village-in -city, as well as its progress of the reconstruction in more than 20
years have been explained. (2)The analysis of present situation. Including
compensation mechanism and villagers’ livelihood, the present compensation
mechanism is not perfect and the villagers' livelihoods capital suffered varying
degrees of damage, which is challenging villagers’ sustainable livelihood.
(3)Establish villagers’ sustainable livelihood security model. Considering the
historical value, realistic value and long-term value, use monetary compensation,
employment compensation, resettlement compensation and perfecting the social
security, which is so-called four-integrated security mechanism, to provide diversified
==>>